I know I'm able to vote in this tiebreaker round, but I'm not sure yet, so I have a question that may help everyone. Have either of these two been previously voted for by a convicted wolf?
I cannot find any of the 3 wolves voting for either Sherb or Mac.
However, on page 5, Milly (aka Filbert) voted for Mac. Then, PeanutsBFF (confirmed wolf) and aiceskating (confirmed wolf) ganged up to vote Filbert out in retaliation, saving Mac's skin.
Seems pretty suspicious to me. Not 100% by any means of course, but nothing is, so I'm going with Mac.
It may be a good idea to go back and double check past seer and wolf votes and compare those to who remains. May not be super helpful, but it could have some good insights.
STRATEGY let's have some fun lol bc i usually never make it this far and want to WIN Based on voting pattern, I am quite confident that Lucky and myself are "confirmed" innocents (barring some mind game strategies ha)
But here is the fun part: Which of two guilty looking players is the final wolf? (if even)
Sylvana has never voted for a wolf, either, and was noticeably absent the one round the seer basically confirmed the vote out. (grain of salt bc we all got that irl stuff come up sometimes, but still. Voting every round but that one is noticeable.) Sherb also questionably still voted for Filbert on that round, but his voting pattern in general is sporadic. While he does not ever vote for a wolf, he several rounds voted for someone not even in contention to being voted out/was their only vote. Sylvana, on the other hand, almost always voted with the other wolves, esp if one was on the chopping block. (So the TLDR of this part: both have similar track records, I just find the randomness of Sherb's to be more indicative of a sporadic and unlucky voter. tho this could be STRAT).
Both are looking a bit guilty, but I am leaning more toward Sylvana at this point as if Sherb is truly innocent, it survives you another round if you pin the blame on him. After an entire game of no WW fakeout strategies (which is fair bc it is hard to do especially early on lol), it would be brilliant to let us think it is Sherb bc of his sporadic voting pattern and sail to the end. There might not be enough votes left after this round to end the last wolf, should they eat either Asho or myself (Assuming Sylvana or Sherb is for sure one of the wolves).
Looking at the other players: Daisy Mae has voted for a wolf in one round, but otherwise is fairly absent. (So, prob not but who knows) Moe & Skye have never voted, unless I missed it. (Both inactive from April)
I don't believe the wolf is inactive due to only eating players who participate in voting after the demise of the other wolves, but who knows! Eden's RNG for their choices could be pretty lucky.
This is a p crucial round, bc there's 4 active players atm (w/ Daisy Mae being sometimes active). Lucky or Raymond will almost surely be the next eaten, assuming the final WW if one of the two other active players following along. That will leave only one of us vs the wolf with this knowledge, probably going into a tiebreaker lol. W/ this knowledge, the final innocent(s) will probably win w/ the help of ghosts & super sleuthing if my theory is correct, but who knows!
(l^ol @ 10 edits, i got cut off! I'd add MORE, TWENTY edits for better phrasing and ongoing evidence bc y not, but 10 is the LIMIT, ACC is like u have a problem my man)
Basically this is mostly @ Asho (& others if u get active again) to consider flipping your vote & avoiding a tie (assuming gdean votes w me lol), as I'm not budging even if I'm the FOOL bc I cracked the code lol
I am prob the next one eaten if my theory is correct, so the other innocents r probably fine for a gamble & will win anyway.
edit: If it IS a tie, this is also to those voting in the tiebreaker as Sherb is not as clear cut of a vote as I and we all initially thought. I would not be so keen to just stack them on him!
I did my own research too actually and was going to use it next round if Sherb is found innocent as he is my first hunch.
Asho is most definitely innocent. he put up the first vote for Peanut one round and another round helped vote Lolly out. That's without question. The people who are inactive I personally have not ruled out 100% as a wolf because I'm sure a RNG would be used to pick a name ? Idk how werewolves usually work.
I think I voted with the wolves like 3 times ? Which is about the same as any other innocent. I will go back and double check and update if that number is wrong... Also in regards to that tie breaker round each round lasts what, 2 days. I may not have read my thread for those two days. I'm sorry I didn't help lol
llpandorall I was leaning towards you... On page 2 you add a vote to the highest option (Reneigh) after Lolly's name has also been brought up, possibly to shift the vote away from the wolf. That vote was consistent with the wolves. On page 6, you vote for Peanut but it's still suspicious because you only did it when it was quite obvious Peanut was going to be voted out (3-6 vote). So again, another strategy move.
Also why did you edit that post that many times? That seems suspicious as you must have adjusted your wording to be extra careful... Okay okay fair @ your comment lol
EDIT: and one might ask why would you post these helpful tips now when you weren't even in question/danger? It could be strategy to make yourself look innocent in advance to the next voting round. Which I'm realizing makes me look suspicious now but I'm just defending myself after your accusation. I want to come out of this just as much as the next person
"llpandorall I was leaning towards you... On page 2 you add a vote to the highest option (Reneigh) after Lolly's name has also been brought up, possibly to shift the vote away from the wolf. That vote was consistent with the wolves. On page 6, you vote for Peanut but it's still suspicious because you only did it when it was quite obvious Peanut was going to be voted out (3-6 vote). So again, another strategy move."
I would hope this selective evidence & flipping it on me will be enough for gdean & asho to consider voting with me. Choosing Round One as evidence, and not even at least mentioning other rounds I voted for wolves? (/citing the one that was closer to being a tie as "late" but not the Lolly vote that I did even later?) Sus!
"Asho is most definitely innocent. he put up the first vote for Peanut one round and another round helped vote Lolly out. That's without question. The people who are inactive I personally have not ruled out 100% as a wolf because I'm sure a RNG would be used to pick a name ? Idk how werewolves usually work."
I have not ruled out the inactive players wholly, as per my post, but I just find it surprising that Eden's RNG for their choice two rounds in a row would be a player actively voting if so.
No one is truly confirmed innocent- I only add myself to that list bc I personally know what I am, in addition to my voting record. I think it is reasonable for you at least to conclude that while I may not be confirmed, I am at least not the most suspicious person lol.
Round 1, I voted for Reneigh. Bc I had nothing to base my vote on other than they voted for me (team petty) and they had votes, so more votes off me the better lol. (And it is round ONE with nothing to go off of haha.)
I then refrained from voting in general bc I had nothing to go off of & have played enough WW to know that if your name is out there like ever in general, you are at risk to be SHEEPED at some point haha. (I was leaning toward voting Peanut before there even was a tie, but that is null bc it didn't happen since Eden ENDED the ROUND before I could make BIG MOVEZ, so can't really be evidenced lol.) But in the tie, it was not really "for sure" that Peanut was going home when i voted. It would have made the votes 5-4 with a lot having not voted yet. Next round I voted for Lolly, tho ig you could argue that is "null" bc of being late to the game again lol. BUT I did not it, whereas the other two have zero wolf votes. (i.e. even if mine are "sketchy" or whatever, at least they exist multiple times)
Next, I like you thought for sure Sherb was the final wolf. Until I finally took time to look at the evidence (bc of people saying Mac looks susp as well) and saw there is someone else with just about the same track record as Sherb, who is now actively pushing for Sherb. Who also is now getting a new target if she survives for the next round and leave both of us alive, so perhaps you'd vote me out with her to win her the game.
I really think you should change your vote, Asho, but that is just me. I don't think Sherb is a horrible backup (given the almost identical track record of voting w/ wolves), but the defense really swayed me even more toward it being Sylvana lol. I am 90% sure we will all win if you do. As Sylvana stated, I had no reason to say anything unless I really thought strongly that she was the one. It was not to build suspicion, because I had WAY better odds if I were a wolf to just stay quiet bc of my voting history having wolves in it and never voting w/ another one except the first round out of saving my own skin/pettiness.
If you don't change your vote, I hope you at least vote for her next round if you are the one alive. (or with me, bc she might leave us BOTH alive now & turn ya against me. Maybe I shot myself in the foot advocating, but I just feel so sure she is the wolf lol. Maybe I won her the GAME saying something.)
Side note: won't it be wild, and we all be the FOOLS if it actually is someone inactive and Eden's RNG Edit3: how many more typos do I need to fix to appear sketchy haha! Either way the game ends, it was fun debating since it is not always people Super Sleuth and debate against villager to vote out!
I don't think we can discount you as not being a wolf, Robyn. It's not unusual for wolves to vote for one and other when the result of the round isn't in any real doubt. That said, it'd be very odd for you to post a summary of the game like you have when there's little attention on you.
I'm still happy with Sherb for now, although I will keep your analysis in mind.